Ethical Hacking News
Big Tech companies are facing intense scrutiny from online safety experts, who accuse them of doing the bare minimum to protect users from harmful content and ensure compliance with the UK's Online Safety Act. The criticism comes after a panel of experts testified before Parliament's Communications and Digital Committee, highlighting the need for more robust measures to regulate online content and prevent exploitation.
Big Tech companies, such as Google, Microsoft, and Meta, are facing criticism for not doing enough to protect users from harmful content and ensure compliance with the UK's Online Safety Act. Experts argue that the companies' algorithms are inconsistent and biased, leading to users being exposed to unwanted content. The lack of effective regulation and enforcement is exacerbated by limited resources at Ofcom's disposal. The success rate of content-takedown requests made by charities and organizations has dropped substantially. The UK's Online Safety Act has had little impact in practice, with experts stating that it has made no difference to children's access to harmful content online. The issue of online safety is a global problem, and other countries, such as Canada, are doing more to protect users from online harms.
Big Tech companies are facing intense scrutiny from online safety experts, who accuse them of doing the bare minimum to protect users from harmful content and ensure compliance with the UK's Online Safety Act. The criticism comes after a panel of experts testified before Parliament's Communications and Digital Committee, highlighting the need for more robust measures to regulate online content and prevent exploitation.
At the heart of the controversy is the performance of major search engine providers, such as Google, Microsoft, and Meta, in downranking or blocking harmful content. Experts argue that these companies are not doing enough to address the issue, with some arguing that their algorithms are inconsistent and biased towards certain types of content.
Professor Clare McGlynn, an expert on violence against women and girls, was particularly critical of Google's approach to downranking harmful content. She argued that the company's algorithms are not systematic or consistent, and that this can lead to users being exposed to unwanted content. McGlynn also highlighted the issue of "unwilling" and "unwanted" porn, which can be easily found on search engines, and argued that these terms should be downranked consistently.
The lack of effective regulation and enforcement is exacerbated by the limited resources at Ofcom's disposal. Alexandra Whiston-Dew, partner at law firm Miscon de Raya, argued that more needs to be done from the tech side to ensure that different parties in the chain of publication are detected early and downranked or blocked accordingly. She also highlighted the issue of publications that actively advertise themselves as websites that host illegal content, which appear to be missing from the search engines' crosshairs.
Another area of concern is the success rate of content-takedown requests made by charities and other organizations. Janaya Walker, interim director at the End Violence Against Women Coalition (EVAW), reported that the success rate for these kinds of reports has dropped substantially, with only 18.2% of reports made to Meta being successful over the past 12 months.
The charity's Trusted Flagger team works closely with social media platforms to report content that victims may have reported to it. However, the team has reported that platforms are not always acting upon these reports, which can leave survivors without recourse.
The issue of online safety is closely tied to the success of the UK's Online Safety Act, which was introduced more than a year ago. However, experts argue that the legislation has had little impact in practice, with England's Children's Commissioner, Dame Rachel de Souza, stating that the OSA "has made absolutely no difference" to children's access to harmful content online.
The criticism of Big Tech companies is not limited to the UK. The issue of online safety is a global problem, and experts argue that other countries, such as Canada, are doing more to protect users from online harms. Canada's swift online civil redress system, for example, allows individuals to make claims and get instant orders to have material taken down.
The lack of effective regulation and enforcement is a major concern for many experts, who argue that the current system is not sufficient to protect users from online exploitation. The issue of online safety is a complex one, and requires a multifaceted approach that involves both tech companies and governments.
In conclusion, the criticism of Big Tech companies for doing the bare minimum to protect users from harmful content and ensure compliance with the UK's Online Safety Act is well justified. The industry needs to do more to address the issue, and governments need to take a more active role in regulating online content and enforcing the law.
Related Information:
https://www.ethicalhackingnews.com/articles/Big-Techs-Shallow-Compliance-Online-Safety-Experts-Accuse-Companies-of-Doing-Bare-Minimum-to-Protect-Users-ehn.shtml
https://www.theregister.com/security/2026/11/14/big-tech-takes-a-beating-as-online-safety-experts-accuse-companies-of-doing-bare-minimum/5309302
Published: Sat Nov 14 03:33:20 2026 by llama3.2 3B Q4_K_M
