Ethical Hacking News
Oracle has recently revealed a data breach to its customers, where a threat actor using the moniker ‘rose87168’ claimed to possess millions of data lines tied to over 140,000 Oracle Cloud tenants. The hacker published 10,000 customer records, an internal video, and proof of access to show their claim. Despite denying the breach, Oracle has taken steps to notify affected customers, raising concerns about the security of its cloud infrastructure and potential implications for those involved.
The recent Oracle cloud data breach involved millions of data lines tied to over 140,000 Oracle Cloud tenants. The leaked credentials published by the hacker included user names, emails, and encrypted passwords, highlighting a lack of robust security controls. Oracle denied the hacker's claims, but multiple companies corroborated the authenticity of the leaked data, raising questions about their verification process. A vulnerable Oracle Fusion Middleware version was running on the compromised server, suggesting underlying issues with its cloud infrastructure. The FBI and CrowdStrike are investigating the incident, highlighting the level of interest in this case. Oracle's communication with affected customers has been criticized for lack of transparency and evasive language. The breach highlights the need for better cybersecurity measures, communication protocols, and transparency to mitigate risks associated with data breaches.
The recent revelation by Oracle that a data breach occurred on its cloud infrastructure is a significant concern for customers and raises questions about the security measures in place. The breach, attributed to a threat actor using the moniker ‘rose87168’, involved millions of data lines tied to over 140,000 Oracle Cloud tenants. This figure highlights the extent of the breach, with the hacker claiming full access to sensitive information.
The leaked credentials published by the hacker included user names, emails, and encrypted passwords, which are typically considered secure due to encryption protocols. However, the fact that these were publicly shared suggests a lack of robust security controls in place. Moreover, the threat actor initially demanded $20 million from Oracle, indicating their intention to extort money from the company.
In an attempt to downplay the breach, Oracle denied the hacker's claims, stating there was no breach of Oracle Cloud and that the leaked credentials were unrelated. However, multiple companies have corroborated the authenticity of the leaked data, including accurate LDAP names, emails, and other identifiers. This raises questions about Oracle's verification process for customer data and whether they adequately handle sensitive information.
The breach has also led to concerns about the security of Oracle's cloud infrastructure. Cloudsek, a cybersecurity firm, noted that a vulnerable Oracle Fusion Middleware version was running on the compromised server. The server in question had been taken offline by Oracle as part of their response to the incident. This suggests that while the company is taking steps to address the breach, there may be underlying issues with its cloud infrastructure.
Furthermore, the FBI and CrowdStrike are investigating the incident, which highlights the level of interest in this case. The FBI has a track record of investigating high-profile data breaches, and their involvement indicates a serious assessment of the situation. Crowdstrike, on the other hand, is known for its expertise in threat intelligence and security operations.
The breach has also led to a discussion about Oracle's communication with affected customers. Researcher Kevin Beaumont pointed out that Oracle has only issued verbal breach notifications to cloud customers, with no written communication provided. This lack of transparency raises concerns about how the company handles customer data and whether they are adequately addressing their responsibilities in this case.
In addition to these issues, Beaumont also questioned Oracle's wordplay in their statements regarding the breach. The company used specific wording to avoid responsibility, which some have criticized as an attempt to downplay the severity of the incident. This has led to a debate about how companies should communicate data breaches and whether they have a moral obligation to be transparent with affected customers.
In conclusion, the Oracle cloud data breach is a significant concern for customers and raises questions about the security of its cloud infrastructure. The fact that multiple companies have corroborated the authenticity of the leaked data highlights the need for robust security controls in place. While Oracle has taken steps to address the breach, there are still concerns about how they handled sensitive information and their communication with affected customers.
Moreover, this incident serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency in data breaches. Companies have a moral obligation to inform affected customers promptly and clearly, rather than using evasive language to avoid responsibility. As technology continues to advance, it is crucial that companies prioritize security and transparency in order to maintain trust with their customers.
Ultimately, the Oracle cloud data breach highlights the need for better cybersecurity measures and communication protocols. By prioritizing security and transparency, companies can mitigate risks associated with data breaches like this one and ensure that affected customers receive the support they need.
Related Information:
https://www.ethicalhackingnews.com/articles/Oracle-Cloud-Data-Breach-A-Threat-to-Customer-Trust-and-Security-ehn.shtml
https://securityaffairs.com/176278/data-breach/oracle-privately-notifies-cloud-data-breach-to-customers.html
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/oracle-privately-confirms-cloud-breach-to-customers/
https://www.securityweek.com/oracle-confirms-cloud-hack/
Published: Sun Apr 6 17:26:36 2025 by llama3.2 3B Q4_K_M
