Ethical Hacking News
Midmarket organizations are struggling to meet their cybersecurity needs due to a lack of visibility, fragmented tech stacks, and inadequate resources. A recent report by Intruder reveals that confidence in identifying and remediating critical risks is high, but only among C-level respondents.
Midmarket organizations face a pressing concern known as the "midmarket security gap", which results from being too big to be overlooked but not large enough to have enterprise-level security resources. The security gap is characterized by a lack of visibility, fragmented tech stacks, and inadequate resources, making it difficult for midmarket companies to meet their cybersecurity needs. Confidence in identifying and remediating critical risks is high, but teams struggle with assessing exposure to critical zero-days, indicating a need for better tools and platforms. The primary challenge faced by midmarket organizations is a lack of visibility into what's exposed, including manually tracking internet-facing assets and running multiple cloud environments without a unified view of risk. Tool fatigue is also prevalent among midmarket teams, with many outgrowing their stacks or stitching together point solutions that don't provide a unified view. The vendor market has been criticized for not providing adequate solutions for midmarket organizations, with many saying enterprise platforms assume too much staff, budget, or complexity. Boards at midmarket companies are not discussing cyber risk, with only 9% discussing it at the board level and many keeping it confined to security leadership alone.
The midmarket security gap is a pressing concern for organizations that occupy an awkward position in the security landscape. These companies, characterized by their moderate size and revenue, are often too big to be overlooked as potential targets but not large enough to have the headcount, budget maturity, or tooling sophistication of an enterprise security team.
According to a recent report by Intruder, a midmarket security gap exists, where organizations struggle to meet their cybersecurity needs due to a lack of visibility, fragmented tech stacks, and inadequate resources. The report surveyed over 500 senior security decision-makers at companies with 400-6,000 employees across the US and UK, providing valuable insights into the challenges faced by midmarket organizations.
The data reveals that confidence in identifying and remediating critical risks is high, but only among C-level respondents. However, when asked about their ability to assess exposure to a critical zero-day, the response was less encouraging, with 51% stating it would take approximately a week. This lack of confidence is further exacerbated by the operational data, which shows that teams are under strain despite growing headcount.
One of the primary challenges faced by midmarket organizations is a lack of visibility into what's exposed. This is evident in the report, where 28% cite this as a top challenge. Furthermore, 18% are still tracking internet-facing assets manually, while 9% are running multiple cloud environments without a unified view of risk. These findings highlight the need for midmarket organizations to invest in tools and platforms that provide a clear and unified view of their security posture.
The report also highlights the issue of tool fatigue among midmarket teams. Forty-four percent have either outgrown their stack or stitched it together from point solutions that don't provide a unified view. The cost shows up clearly in the operational data, with 26% citing navigating too many tools as a top challenge. Additionally, 24% cite too many alerts with poor prioritization, while 20% struggle to effectively measure or report on their cyber hygiene.
The vendor market has also been criticized for not providing adequate solutions for midmarket organizations. Forty-six percent say enterprise platforms assume more staff, budget, or complexity than they can support, while 29% say SMB tools no longer meet their needs. This suggests that the current tooling landscape is not designed with midmarket organizations in mind.
Perhaps most concerning, however, is that boards at midmarket companies are not discussing cyber risk. Just nine percent discuss it at board level, while 34% reach executive leadership. The majority (51%) keep the conversation at security or IT leadership only, and 7% confine it entirely to the security team. This lack of visibility and awareness means that there is limited pressure to confront the problems faced by midmarket organizations.
The report concludes that middle market companies have a lot more to say on their cybersecurity strategies than they actually deliver. The data reveals that headcount is holding up as estates scale, but investment priorities are shifting in ways that may not align with the actual challenges faced by teams.
In conclusion, the midmarket security gap is a pressing concern for organizations that occupy an awkward position in the security landscape. The report highlights the need for midmarket organizations to invest in tools and platforms that provide a clear and unified view of their security posture. Additionally, there is a need for boards at midmarket companies to take cyber risk more seriously, as it currently remains largely below the radar.
Related Information:
https://www.ethicalhackingnews.com/articles/The-Midmarket-Security-Gap-A-Growing-Concern-for-Organizations-ehn.shtml
https://go.theregister.com/feed/www.theregister.com/2026/03/17/too_big_ignore_too/
https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/17/too_big_ignore_too/
https://cyberinsurancenews.org/cybersecurity-midmarket-gap-intruder-report/
Published: Tue Mar 17 05:04:14 2026 by llama3.2 3B Q4_K_M
