Ethical Hacking News
The use of facial recognition technology by government agencies and private companies has raised significant concerns about data privacy, security, and personal liberty. The recent announcement by CBP that it will be using a face recognition tool to enhance its efforts to "disrupt, degrade, and dismantle" people and networks viewed as security threats has highlighted the growing concern about this technology. As the development of facial recognition technology continues to move forward, it is essential that we consider the potential risks and limitations of this technology and work towards developing safeguards that protect our personal liberty and data privacy.
CBP has signed a deal with Clearview AI to use face recognition technology worth $225,000 per year. The use of facial recognition technology by CBP raises concerns about data privacy and security, as well as potential misuse. Senator Ed Markey's legislation aims to ban the use of face recognition technology by ICE and CBP. The removal of Clearview AI's 40 model from the market highlights growing unease about facial recognition technology. The technology has shown promising results in law enforcement and national security, but its risks and limitations cannot be ignored.
In recent months, the news has been filled with stories about the increasing use of facial recognition technology by various government agencies and private companies. The most recent development in this area is the announcement by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) that it will be using a face recognition tool built on billions of images scraped from the internet to enhance its efforts to "disrupt, degrade, and dismantle" people and networks viewed as security threats.
The CBP has signed a deal with Clearview AI, a company that provides access to a vast database of facial images that can be used for face recognition purposes. The deal is worth $225,000 per year and will provide the agency with access to the company's tools, including its face recognition software, which can be used to identify individuals in real-time.
The use of facial recognition technology by CBP has raised concerns among civil liberties groups and lawmakers, who argue that it could be used to infringe on the rights of US citizens. Senator Ed Markey has introduced legislation that would bar ICE and CBP from using face recognition technology altogether, citing concerns that biometric surveillance is being embedded without clear limits, transparency, or public consent.
The use of facial recognition technology by private companies such as CBP also raises questions about data privacy and security. Clearview AI's business model relies on scraping photos from public websites at scale, which has raised concerns among experts and lawmakers about the potential for misuse.
In addition to the CBP deal, the company has also appeared in DHS's recently released artificial intelligence inventory, linked to a CBP pilot initiated in October 2025. The inventory entry ties the pilot to CBP's Traveler Verification System, which conducts face comparisons at ports of entry and other border-related screenings.
Despite concerns about its use, facial recognition technology is becoming increasingly sophisticated and has shown promising results in various applications such as law enforcement and national security. However, its potential risks and limitations cannot be ignored, particularly when it comes to issues of data privacy and security.
The recent testing by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) found that face-search systems can perform well on "high-quality visa-like photos" but falter in less controlled settings. The testing underscores a central limitation of the technology: NIST found that face-search systems cannot reduce false matches without also increasing the risk that the systems fail to recognize the correct person.
As a result, NIST says agencies may operate the software in an "investigative" setting that returns a ranked list of candidates for human review rather than a single confirmed match. When systems are configured to always return candidates, however, searches for people not already in the database will still generate "matches" for review. In those cases, the results will always be 100 percent wrong.
The use of facial recognition technology is just one example of how AI is becoming increasingly integrated into various aspects of our lives. From smart glasses to social media platforms, AI-powered tools are becoming more prevalent and raising concerns about data privacy, security, and personal liberty.
In recent months, there have been reports of AI-powered tools being used for nefarious purposes such as espionage and hacking. The use of facial recognition technology by private companies and government agencies has raised questions about the potential risks and limitations of this technology.
Despite these concerns, the development of facial recognition technology continues to move forward, with companies like Clearview AI pushing the boundaries of what is possible. However, it is essential that we consider the potential risks and limitations of this technology and work towards developing safeguards that protect our personal liberty and data privacy.
The use of facial recognition technology by CBP has raised concerns among civil liberties groups and lawmakers who argue that it could be used to infringe on the rights of US citizens. Senator Ed Markey's introduction of legislation aimed at banning the use of face recognition technology by ICE and CBP has highlighted the growing concern about the potential risks and limitations of this technology.
The recent announcement by Clearview AI that it will no longer provide access to its 4o model, a facial recognition tool used by Meta, has sparked concerns among experts and lawmakers. The removal of this tool from the market highlights the growing unease about the use of facial recognition technology in various applications.
In conclusion, the use of facial recognition technology by CBP has raised significant concerns about data privacy, security, and personal liberty. While it may have some benefits in certain applications such as law enforcement and national security, its potential risks and limitations cannot be ignored. It is essential that we consider these concerns and work towards developing safeguards that protect our rights and data privacy.
Related Information:
https://www.ethicalhackingnews.com/articles/The-Rise-of-Facial-Recognition-Technology-A-Growing-Concern-for-Personal-Liberty-ehn.shtml
https://www.wired.com/story/cbp-signs-clearview-ai-deal-to-use-face-recognition-for-tactical-targeting/
https://stateofsurveillance.org/news/cbp-clearview-ai-60-billion-faces-tactical-targeting-2026/
https://www.wired.com/story/clearview-ai-client-list-cerberus-malware-security-news/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clearview_AI
Published: Wed Feb 18 07:10:17 2026 by llama3.2 3B Q4_K_M
